Growing population is big problem in developing counties. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or countryside?
There is mounting evidence indicating that urban sprawl is on the rise in developing countries. To accommodate a large proportion of people government should take actions to construct new houses in cities or outskirts. However, some advocate the idea that rural areas are the appropriate candidate for such developments, I believe that countryside should remain intact owing to be number of justifiable reasons.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that new houses would destroy rural landscape. That is, if city dwellers construct new houses in green lands and serene areas of countryside, there will be inevitable consequences due to ultimate loss of vulnerable and irreplaceable natures. A good illustration of that is the extinction of many habitant in rural areas owing to property dwellers come up to lay the foundation for new houses. This in turn will change the appearance of outskirt permanently which is irreversible damage.
However, rapid urbanization and raise of population leads to lack of space in cities. The most axiomatic debate is concerned with how is possible to response increasing rooms’ demand. That is to say, if government wants to preserved rural areas and taking action for drastic residential needs simultaneously, it should alter the construction in cities to skyscrapers. Take a spectacular tower that more than thousand people are more likely to reside as an example. To put it differently, by this consideration, not only there would be more rooms for city dwellers, but also fragile ecology would preserve from irreversible damage which may cause by migration.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that invading the countryside should be avoided. This is mainly plausible due to creating skyscrapers in cities over against taking toll on countryside natures.
- Growing population is big problem in developing counties Should the government provide new homes in the cities or countryside 78
- Growing population is big problem in developing counties Should the government provide new homes in the cities or countryside 78
- Growing population is big problem in developing counties Should the government provide new homes in the cities or countryside 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...Take a spectacular tower that more than thousand people are more likely to reside as an ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37755102041 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10962679366 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1037140186 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.928571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173593015397 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563259735914 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472262081867 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109380854556 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420079440747 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.