A growing population is a big problem in many countries. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or countryside?
Since ages, increasing populous has a direct impact on dwelling spaces. In most countries, population has raised to alarming levels and it is a challenging task to providing shelter to them, but the real question is where to build new infrastructure in, urban or rural site. In my opinion, government must pan to build new homes in villages as we have a lot of space and resources.
To begin with, building new houses in cities does not seems to be a viable solution as it creates a lot of problems to it’s habitants. Firstly, urban landscape was build decades ago and the planners has not thought that a lot of people will migrate to cities leading to over population. Secondly, cities have limited resources and it is quite a task to provide its habitants with food and water. Last but not the least, modern cities are the biggest contributor of pollution, thereby making it difficult to live in.
On the other hand, building infrastructure in rural areas seems like a great idea and a viable solution to decongest our cities. It will generate employment for people not only in developing phase but afterward as well. Government can shift industries where raw materials are available in abundance, in order to save transportation cost and pollutants. Needless to mention, rural area has a lot of workforce which can be utilised, and it will restrain people from moving to cities in search of job. For instance, India Government is providing subsidiary as well as loans to setup vegetable processing industries in villages. With the result, it creates jobs, saves fuel and reduces pollution.
To my mind, we must build new homes in countryside as we have abundance of land, resources and workforce; and shifting industries to rural area will ensure people get livelihood. To conclude, cities are congested because of which a shift in approach is required to make our country progressive.
- Stores should sell local food products and not the imported food products. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historic buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it. As a citizen, you don’t want it to happen. Write a letter to the city council and sayWhat is the importance of the building?W 78
- Individuals should improve the environment or is it the government and large companies that should take action 81
- Some people say the Olympic Games are not relevant in the 21st century. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Employers should give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
... building new houses in cities does not seems to be a viable solution as it creates a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
... building new houses in cities does not seems to be a viable solution as it creates a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 572, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set up'?
Suggestion: to set up
...s providing subsidiary as well as loans to setup vegetable processing industries in vill...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99373040752 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87205850221 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554858934169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9846950664 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202082290902 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593087548217 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443607117813 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121739960257 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488429732549 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.