People have different views that hard working is the primary element if you want to succeed. In my perspective, I believe that hard work is more important for individuals who want to succeed.
There are some reasons why talent is also really important in success. The first reason is that as people have talent when they were born, it is easier for them to study their work. For example, individuals who are specialist in their work since they were a child, they don’t have to put so many efforts like others who don’t have talent. As a result, it won’t cost them so much time to become a successful person. Moreover, they can use this free time to learn other things instead. The second reason is that since being received the attention from investors about their talent, these people will receive chances easily. For instance, Messi who is super talent in soccer since he was a little boy so that he was famous rapidly over time.
While talent is needed for successful aim, I would argue that hard work is more important because success requires you a huge amount of knowledge which is accumulated from many lessons, training. For example, to become the most famous football player these days, Ronaldo has to overcome the huge number of stressful training and suffered the pain from injuries during the practical process.
In conclusion, while talent is also one of the most important elements in success, I strongly believe that hard work gives people more valuable lessons, knowledge to become a successful person.
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 75
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 and 2003Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People have different views that hard wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45401193074 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9954932827 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353382863018 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143596888147 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134415418857 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248650054753 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870462635787 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.