The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The illustration represents changes in the six categories of American people who went to fast food restaurants over a decade, from 2003.
Overall, the frequency of once a week and once or twice a month accounted for a majority during then years among people living in the USA while there was a small percentage of Americans who avoided fast food or ate it every day.
On the one hand, in 2003, 17% of American people chose to visit fast food restaurants several times a week, which was just half as much as their counterparts who did once a week and once or twice a month (31% and 30% respectively). 2006 saw an increase in the percentage of several times a week (nearly 5%) and once a week ( reaching its peak at 32%) but witnessed a drop of almost 8% in the number of once or twice a month. In 2013, American's most frequency pattern was once or twice a month while 2013 saw a reduction of about 5% of several times a week and once a week.
On the other hand, the percentage of never or every day were all below 5% during the whole period.
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important! 56
- The graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 and 2003Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d restaurants over a decade, from 2003. Overall, the frequency of once a week an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... avoided fast food or ate it every day. On the one hand, there was a huge number...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2006 but it hit a peak of closely 33% at the rest of the period. On the o...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...closely 33% at the rest of the period. On the other hand, there was a slight d...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of the period. On the other hand, there was a slight decrease in the numbe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26288659794 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32994822496 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3745652465 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222700479788 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110342082637 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078528852156 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149394295335 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355251292363 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.