The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The presented bar chart illustrates the changes in percentage of fast food intake by the people of USA over a decade based on their consumption rate at regular intervals.
It is obvious from the chart that the percentage of people who eat fast food every single day over the years is less with an average of around 4 percentage. Similarly, with same average percentage are the people who never consumed the fast food at all.
In contrast, the percentage of people who eat once in a week and once or twice a month have seen a fluctuation over the time period. With an approximate averages of 31 percentage and 29 percentage. These are much high when compared to those that ate everyday and to those who never tasted it.
Where as, the percentage that included fast food in their diet many times a week saw an alteration during the decade with an average of 17. And also, consuming few times a year with an average percentage of around 13 few times a y
- Most people believe money is a very important consideration when choosing a job as it can help you get a better lifestyle however there are some who believe it is more important to have a job you enjoy and that this and not money will lead to greater happ 92
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Life was simpler wihout so much of technology. Do you agree ? 56
- Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is it positive or negative development 73
- The table and notes below give information about student enrolments at Brighton co ed secondary school in 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The presented bar chart illustrates the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umption rate at regular intervals. It is obvious from the chart that the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver consumed the fast food at all. In contrast, the percentage of people wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'average'?
Suggestion: average
...er the time period. With an approximate averages of 31 percentage and 29 percentage. The...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ch high when compared to those that ate everyday and to those who never tasted it. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and to those who never tasted it. Where as, the percentage that included f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 13, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...e who never tasted it. Where as, the percentage that included fast food...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with an average percentage of around 13 few times a y
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5838150289 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57059763496 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5215059782 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142594632089 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715456082394 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630460036612 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104917919889 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646165006624 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.