The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008.
The first illustration describes the proportion of women living below the rate poverty and the second illustration compares the level of poverty in different ages and sexes in America in the year 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that single women likely had a poor life rather than married women. Meanwhile, people who were under 5 had a high rate of poverty in both sex while poverty occurred in most women in the 18-24 age.
On the one hand, the proportion of poverty in single women with no dependent children was 54%, accounted for over half of the total. At the same time, around 26% of single women with dependent children also lived in poverty. By contrast, only 8%, and 12% respectively in the figure for married women with either have or have not dependent children.
On the other hand, in 2008, there was a nearly same figure for people in both sexes under 5 years old living poorly, about 20%, twice as the figure of people who were 45-54. These were also the lowest figures for both sexes. However, the figure for women in 18-24 age peaked at 20% while the figure for men was just 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | Hira Shaheen | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Sai sushma | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | hquynh812 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | Hyacinthos | 67 | view |
| 2014-07-31 | eddysuaib | 90 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 and 2003Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 56
- Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important! 56
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58080808081 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22862369985 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1949356885 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176390543526 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814089373268 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080141453812 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133731992346 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079899947987 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.