The graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 and 2003
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary
the line graph compares the number of hours that male and female workers did in the various developing nations in two separate years, 1998 and 2003.
Overall, people in Mongolia had the largest figure for work than the other countries while South Africa had the lowest hours used to work. Meanwhile, women in Benin also had to work much time than the average.
On the one hand, the working hours in Mongolia was over 8 hours per day, which also the highest figure. By contrast, only 44 minutes was spent to work by women in there. At the same time, there was a similar figure over 8 hours that people had to work per day in Benin, Mexico, and India but Benin witnessed the higher hours that women worked.
On the other hand, the population in South Africa just spent only closely 6 hours each day to work, it also the lowest figure compared to the working hours in Rep. Of Korea, Madagascar, with nearly 8 hours.
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008. 78
- The graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing world between the years 1998 and 2003Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary 56
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sector in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 61
- Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important! 56
- The maps summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph compares the number of hours...
^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork by women in there. At the same time, there was a similar figure over 8 hours ...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n South Africa just spent only closely 6 hours each day to work, it also the lowe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49700598802 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05510517421 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7252608339 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.875 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172037678575 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793637180006 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032379645243 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107771331123 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133122132224 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.