Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed. While others believe action can be taken to bring about change. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is irrefutable that human attitude and activities towards our planet earth have made the situation worse for other forms of life as well as for humans also. It has argued by a significant number of individuals that we cannot reverse it by doing any action. Although others think some steps can help the world to be a better place than today. Before putting any opinion, it is important to investigate both aspects.
On the one side, the growing population and requirements to fulfill the needs of them are damaging the habitat for other creatures on this globe. Industrialization is one of the contributors to destroying forests with that various species are getting extinct from different regions of the world. The concept of urban regions to build houses and other amenities for the growing people is ever rising issue. So that to complete the demands of people, we are removing plants and other vegetation from the grassland but still finds insufficient. Hence I believe that in the future, this planet will not adequate to accommodate this ever-rising population of the earth. Additionally, many scientists are searching for alternatives such as the possibility of survival on other planets.
On the other side, although humans have made the situation difficult for other animals to survive on the same planet, the scientific approach can lead us to have a better future for all living organisms. Our scientist with the aid of technology and science has made tremendous efforts to bring back the better situation in this world, for the possibility of survival of all creatures. For instance, plastic contamination in the sea is destroying millions of lives every year around the world and to find an alternative for plastics an environmentalist has developed biodegradable plastic to defeat those difficulties.
In conclusion, although our experts are fighting to minimize the damaging situation created through people. Nevertheless, I personally believe that the time has passed and it is impossible to improve those conditions.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-29 | bhatvishal@ | 84 | view |
2019-06-29 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
2019-06-28 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
2019-06-28 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
2019-06-28 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree? 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 42
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 78
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...her forms of life as well as for humans also. It has argued by a significant number ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... cannot reverse it by doing any action. Although others think some steps can help the wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 542, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...grassland but still finds insufficient. Hence I believe that in the future, this plan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2256097561 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02364639751 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564024390244 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8482593968 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.266666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196948303052 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620139349696 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459516747887 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108467202737 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668649653895 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.