Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.
It is believed that due to the actions of people,there is a danger to the existence of flaura and fauna. Though certain individuals think that it is not managable due to increase in population and change in lifestyle. However, others feel that by taking some measures like strict laws and awareness can lead to the positive outcomes. In my opinion, the situation can be handled by taking required actions.
Human beings have made the life of plants and animals difficult for their own benefits and luxury. Firstly, the major impact on living beings other than homo sapiens is beacuse of increase in the population which has resulted in the deforestaion. Trees are cut to cater the ever increasing requirment of new houses which also affects the animals as their natural habitat is destroyed. Secondly, modern lifestyle leads to high use of plastics and other non-renewable items. All this waste is thrown in water bodies without treating and it becomes a threat to water animals.
Despite, causing so much danger, it is possible that necessary remedies are taken to prevent the further damage. To start with, general awareness about population control should be created amongst the citizens. For instance, in India, electronic and print media is used to spread the advantages of having a small family. Moreover, strict rules and regulations should be implemented by the government to avoid use of materials that are harmful for the environment. To illustrate, in many countries, use of plastic is banned and heavy penalty is imposed upon the usage of the same.
In conclusion, I would say, although enough danger has been caused to the environment by people, it can be saved by combined efforts of both public and the government. As it is rightly said, that, its now than never late.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Karthikielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Aroraprerna | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Aroraprerna | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Gunjan Pratap | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | mdsameer | 56 | view |
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 61
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot now not join him. You've found another friend who can go instead of you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:Explain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead of you 73
- Some people say that E books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...lieved that due to the actions of people,there is a danger to the existence of flaura ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... said, that, its now than never late.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04362416107 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70894340981 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6105024176 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20742743672 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055004576998 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438333028434 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106163668889 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403412790082 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.