Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
There is no shortage of opinions on correcting mistakes of the teacher or the meeting leader right away or after class or even saying nothing about it. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely choose to wait until the class or meeting is over to discuss about the mistakes with them. I feel this way for two main reasons which I would be exploring in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, finish listening to the elders' presentation is a sign of respect. As we are educated by our parents to look up to the seniors wherever we go to leave some good impressions on them. Some people might think we are impolite if we interrupt their speech and we might also embarrass them in front of others. My personal experience is a great example. My strict-rule grandmother does not like her children interfering with her in the middle of the sentence. If we did, we would be scolded and grounded for a whole week. Sometimes this is due to the old culture of the society so we might as well follow them. Hence, correcting peers after class is definitely a polite way.
Besides, correcting them in the middle of the presentation might lead them to forget their next lines. Panicking in front of the audience is really common to every individual no matter how old you are. As you get anxious, you would definitely forget what your next point is if there is a sudden alteration plan. Drawing from my own experience, I was quite nervous during my thesis defense as the audience would stare at me while I was presenting my work. Suddenly, my professor raised a question that I had not thought through during my rehearsals. In the end, I was lost of words as my brain went exactly blank after answering the ultimate furious questions. Therefore, interrupting others' speech is quite overwhelmed with disadvantages.
Nevertheless, there are still some debates about this statement. I could not deny that correcting the teacher right away is actually a smart act of bravery. Not to mention that how chaotic if the students below received the wrong information from their professors during the lecture. I would be crucial that the right information should be taken so that we could score in our exams and answer your employers correctly. This is ultimately important as the importance of those correct answers would decide our future.
In the light of above-mentioned, I strongly believe that correcting the mistakes of your peers until the meeting is over would be the best solution for the act of respect and preventing them from forgetting their next line.
- The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 78
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elders'' or 'elder's'?
Suggestion: elders'; elder's
...t and foremost, finish listening to the elders presentation is a sign of respect. As w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, hence, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, well, while, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 24.0651302605 262% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80316742081 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75015332257 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2330180529 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4583333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107645974824 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278634524486 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048539009443 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733305027468 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657197926101 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elders'' or 'elder's'?
Suggestion: elders'; elder's
...t and foremost, finish listening to the elders presentation is a sign of respect. As w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, hence, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, well, while, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 24.0651302605 262% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 442.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80316742081 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75015332257 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2330180529 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4583333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107645974824 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278634524486 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048539009443 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733305027468 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657197926101 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.