An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
In today’s society, there is a marked increase in the consumption of consumer goods due to population growth. Furthermore, over the past decade, the natural environment has undergone considerable degradation. While it is true that consumer goods production has an undeniable relationship with the environment, there are some solutions we can explore to tackle this problem.
Nowadays, in the stress, we can easily find that the petrol cars are gradually being replaced by electric cars. From the customer’s perspective, people think that using automatic vehicles has a positive environmental impact. However, cobalt, a critical mineral for electric car batteries, is very rare. Improper disposal of these batteries can contaminate the water resources, which are home to many aquatic animals. Moreover, by using this unclear water source for a long time, people's health is threatened by many chronic diseases such as cancer or renal impairment. Another reason is the essential role of plastic in production processes, packaging, and transportation. Some studies show that about 90% of plastic materials are discarded directly into the environment, bypassing waste treatment processes. An increase in goods production would lead to a rise in this number, which means more garbage or plastic bags would be discarded and pose a detrimental effect on the environment, also our home and that of countless species.
Some solutions could be taken to solve this environmental problem. In terms of vehicles, companies should prioritize research and development of materials with a longer lifespan or decompose naturally. Moreover, the government should minimize plastic consumption by implementing a higher tax on plastic compared to other environmentally friendly alternatives such as paper.
In conclusion, it's clear that the production process directly affects the environment. Increasing taxes on environmentally unfriendly practices or materials can be part of the solution.
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works 11
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and othervehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 73
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74489795918 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22577581347 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6300057436 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176922030941 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540819751819 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656585363075 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119693729469 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102581134876 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.