With an increasing population communicating via Internet and text message, face to face communication will became a thing in the past. To what extent do you agree?
Introduction of phones and the internet have changed the way of communication. A significant number of individuals believe that more and more people are choosing internet communication these days and this will demolish the traditional way face to face communication. I completely agree with the notion. In my opinion, the benefits like speed and time savings by this technology will completely change the way people corresponds.
Firstly, the fast pace in talking with anyone at any time makes this technology quite handy for the generation, therefore, individuals prefer to choose internet technology to have correspondence with others. People can share their pictures, video messages and texts to discuss things with their family and friends at any hour of the day. For instance, the Facebook application with the aid of an internet connection allows individuals to share video messages with their friends instantly.
Secondly, a person can talk with anyone around the world without visiting there, which saves a lot of time of busy people of this modern world. In addition to that, this way of communication is economical as it saves travelling time and money of the person to deliver a message. For instance, various conferences and discussions are conducted these days by multinational organizations to develop similar protocols in all regions of the world with the help of internet technology.
In conclusion, this internet technology has made communication better and strong among individuals. The advantageous like instant calling, time and money-saving resulted in the elimination of direct physical communication. Hence, I believe that face to face communication will become a history of communication in the coming years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | sudheerssmg | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | sudheerssmg | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-15 | BaljitKaur | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
- Most high-level jobs are done by men. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women? 67
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think a younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people feel that animals should have the same rights as humans but others think they are not as equal or intelligent as us so should not have the same rights Discuss both opinions and give your opinion 91
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with the help of internet technology. In conclusion, this internet technology ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of communication in the coming years.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50746268657 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19191065141 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526119402985 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3024530642 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239668813018 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920080242598 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801635917883 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150429190957 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059206113848 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.