The Internet is replacing books. What extent do you agree?
There is a controversial issue about the importance of the Internet in the world. Some computer users believe that it is gradually substituting books, while some readers state that it will never happen. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree that the popularity of books is fading in favor of the Internet.
Let us start with reasons why some computer users argue that the web is replacing books. The first reason is that it is more convenient to get digital books. People often find it difficult to get traditional books, because they are not always available in stores, but with the help of Internet it is no longer a big obstacle. Another reason is that ebooks can be read from a great deal of devices. Traditional books limit readers in usage, since they have to carry it apart from other stuff, but digital books are readable on many gadgets, such as smart phones and tablets. Therefore, it is reasonable to state that the Internet is displacing paper books.
However, some readers propagate that the network will substitute books at no time. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, books are independent from electricity. The net is not accessible to use, when electricity suppliers cut the power, but, in contrast, paper books allow individuals to enjoy unrestricted. Secondly, paper books create better impression. Reading conservative books share a sense of comfort to readers, as it is not only comfortable to hold, but also smells pleasant. As a result, it is rational to say that the cyber will never displace text editions.
In conclusion, even though some readers advocate that the cyberspace will not replace books ever, I think that more people are changing their reading preferences in favor of the Internet for the above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 92 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | sonclhoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | drmona.914 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | dung123@ | view |
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users' privacy. However, others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites; instead, users should be more careful about what they make available online.Discu 73
- A friend you met last year has invited you to visit him/her in his/her country. You have never been there before and need some information before you leave.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:request advise about a gift for his/her familyask abo 73
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for the latest technological developments. How far do you agree? 78
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books. What extent do you agree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00993377483 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68471993932 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6043381467 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131957134658 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437917808425 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509730501252 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864013153784 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544179822918 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.