Museums are very important part of our society, in order to keep the history and culture alive. However, the dark side is, it is becoming more and more expensive to maintain them. Therefore, I will explain the best possible way to raise fund for museums, so that people can visit them.
Maintenance of precious collections in museums requires a lot of money and this is the reason why sometimes museums fail. Nevertheless, there is a proven way to get finance so that museums can be kept functional. The best way is public-private partnership, which involves collaboration between government agency and private company to build, finance and manage the museums. This model is primarily used for infrastructural projects. Although, it could also have been possible to acquire private-funding model to maintain the museum, it increases price of tickets, making it expensive for common people to visit museums, because a private company would invest in something only to earn profit out of it.
Therefore, it is important that government involves itself into it to prevent museum from going completely into private hands. In addition, government funding would also offer subsidized ticket price to benefit public. Moreover, involving private organization in managing museum operations, brings the best managing practices, that are incorporated in running companies, which eventually improve the functionality of museums. In Europe, most of the museums are funded with the same model and successfully attracting millions of visitors every year.
To summarize, keeping the positive sides of joint funding by government authorities and private companies, I can certainly opine that this is the best way to fund the museum so that people can visit them and know more about their rich heritage.
- It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museums open to the public what do you think is the best way of funding them example government business and individual 56
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39501779359 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.953685203 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562277580071 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.650245446 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.615384615 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225563841545 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791526100386 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407346973268 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151643845304 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352008972269 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.