We have seen stupendous improvement in medical science in last century. Because of this, soon it will also be possible that people live up to hundred or even double of that. Some people take it as a positive development while others think it will not be a good step. I will discuss both views and give reasons why I do not support the idea of longevity.
Most old age people die from chronic diseases such as hyperglycemia and cardio-respiratory disorders. However, medical science has invented solutions for many such health issues. These path-breaking developments will help people stay immune from these diseases, in order to live a longer life. This, in turn will help elderly people stay healthy and happy so that they can also lead an active life. Moreover, people often spend much of their earnings for medical treatments in last phase of their life. Nevertheless, being healthy in old age, will reduce their financial burden.
However, some people believe it is not a good idea to live up to hundred or two hundred years, as they may not be able to work after certain age. For example, if a person retires at the age of sixty-five and live up to two hundred years, he will be fully dependent on pension, which in turn will increase financial burden on government. Imagine, how much money government will need to spend on old age people if everybody lives for two centuries. Moreover, people after certain age, may also end up living a lonely life due to ignorance from their own people.
In conclusion, I personally do not think that living for one or two centuries in the future, is favorable although, it sounds tempting, it has many disadvantages such as extra burden on government and family as well as probable loneliness for more than half of life.
- It is becoming increasingly expensive to keep museums open to the public what do you think is the best way of funding them example government business and individual 56
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...also be possible that people live up to hundred or even double of that. Some people tak...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...eve it is not a good idea to live up to hundred or two hundred years, as they may not b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79738562092 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70023248999 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2810533798 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292149301767 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103892173252 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070880439616 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177159404421 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123152164171 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.