Nowadays, it is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. The infrastructures being built in recent times are focused more on quality rather than beauty. It is expedient that, while building structures, a lot of attention should be paid to everything needed to give that structure good quality.
For instance, we have had series of events this year in Nigeria where infrastructures that were built have collapsed to the ground. Things like these will always occur because we have focused more on making the building beautiful rather than focusing on the quality which is more important. Deaths and accidents can be avoided due to good quality buildings. The main aim of a building should not be how beautiful it is; but, the main aim should be to build this structure to serve its purpose.
Architects should not worry about producing as a work of art. Further, they should focus on the components required for quality buildings. It would be a nightmare when an architect’s production is a good work of art ,but, afterwards, receives word that his just concluded project has been leveled down to the ground. For example, an architect should prefer to build a reinforced pillar instead of building a beautiful pillar. After a building has reached completion, the builder is more concerned with how long the building will stand. Quality before beauty!
In conclusion, I agree that it is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful and Architects should not bother about producing as a work of art. It is good for a building to look beautiful but it is a better investment for a building to serve its purpose.
- Some people believe that the government should not spend too much money on outer space exploration Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that watching TV programs can help children s development while others disagree What is your opinon 67
- The street where you live is very polluted Write to the local council and ask to act about this situation You should say What is the main problem How does it affect your street Give some suggestions and request action 73
- some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- More and more people give money as a gift rather than buy some items What is the reason for this Is it a negative or positive trend 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...htmare when an architect’s production is a good work of art ,but, afterwards, rec...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tect’s production is a good work of art ,but, afterwards, receives word that his ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88421052632 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80844262071 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9435826625 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482788323939 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19271383928 0.084324248473 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187215297308 0.0667982634062 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344661717779 0.151304729494 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178632128268 0.056905535591 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.