It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?
It is commonly believed that the government investing lot of its money on preserving wildlife, in my opinion, there are many other important problems that government should also consider.
On the one hand, animals have become an important species in the world. Many countries across the globe, giving more priority in protecting wildlife, as animals plays a key role in protecting nature and environment. My mother's generation had much interest in protecting wild animals, but today the interest towards that was not as much as before. For example, there are not many zoos are available now to protect and feed animals, where in olden days humans used to live with animals just like with people.
On the other hand, our reliance on fossil fuels is increasing every day. These fuels are produced in the earth from the dead animals and plants. It is important for the government to move towards renewable resources namely solar energy, hybrid gas, as such, the killing wild animals will be reduced much. In addition to this, effective measure needs to be taken by government to spread awareness of how important the animals to this universe, by spending some of its budget on advertisements. The other main problems like Deforestation, Desertification are also taking part in destroying wildlife. The effect of these can be overcome by proper vegetation. I believe the government should also spends some of its budget in these problems, as they internally helps protecting animals in some way.
In conclusion, in today's world wild life have become as important as humans, although the government showing interests towards protecting wild life, it is time to consider problems like deforestation, desertification, fossil fuels which also helps in protecting wild life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | abcde1 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | abcde1 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | abcd1234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 56
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 56
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, millions of people continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the solutions for this? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that government should also consider. On the one hand, animals have become an ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...n. I believe the government should also spends some of its budget in these problems, a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 758, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...t in these problems, as they internally helps protecting animals in some way. In...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to protect' or 'protect'.
Suggestion: to protect; protect
...hese problems, as they internally helps protecting animals in some way. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24210526316 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86732582771 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554385964912 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5931716441 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225054840346 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768964093365 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565284739723 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146640958626 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448468884868 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.