Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think a younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree.?
The importance of leadership roles has always been a sensitive topic for many people, where some suggest that old individuals are experienced enough to handle the leader's position, while others reject this notion. In my opinion, the former view appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favouring why old people are excel
ling in top positions.
After analysing the statement and explaining further, the first and foremost reason behind this is that old people have years of practical knowledge and expertise in doing business. This is why they effectively handle their staff when they are stuck in problematic situations such as client meetings, sales-marketing and increasing the profit of the organisation. Another striking benefit in this regard is that mature people are efficient in team management skills which helps in maintaining good relationships within the workplace. Categorically discussing, it cannot be ignored that the main reason behind that is their Intelligence and hands-on experience.
Probing ahead, there are some people who can concur that youngsters would be best suited for management positions due to advancement in the technological sector. They ignore the fact that only if one has outstanding technical skills will not be considered the best candidate because of the lacking of the other qualities. Problem-solving, for example, a 20-year-old might have excellent technical skills but maybe a poor team member who will be unable to solve clashes within and outside the company, then it would be an indigent choice. Therefore, the above-mentioned reason has clearly been stated by many people who are against choosing young leaders.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed how old people utilise their experience in building a team of proficient employees which is a great deal for the organisation as well as for the staff. So there are ample qualities that are considered while choosing a leader and due to inexperienced young people would not be suitable for these positions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-21 | shadow1222 | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-14 | S.Ranaut | 78 | view |
- An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school replacing books and other printed material like exams and assignments What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend Give reasons and include any r 89
- Many people think that the most important things in life are free cannot be bought Do you agree or disagree 61
- In some countries people waste a lot of food that they buy in a shop and restaurants Why do you think it is What can be done to solve this problem 71
- In many countries traditional customs are being lost Why do you think this is What can parents and schools do to keep customs alive 85
- Nowadays men and women decided to have children in their lives Why is this occurring What are the impacts of this development on society and family 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...for favouring why old people are excel ling in top positions. After analysing th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atic situations such as client meetings, sales-marketing and increasing the profi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40186915888 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00426549501 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585669781931 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8252262107 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.384615385 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194256712137 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681266706481 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462381980854 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953793840893 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572177834794 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.