In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is a trend that some city councils establish rules for the major design of certain streets and any constructor should follow them. Meanwhile, many cities still do not regulate it and everyone can build in any style they want. I think that both sides have their merits and in this essay, I am going to discuss pros and cos of it.
On the one hand, stay those who believe that city image should be establish by architectural authorities. This idea may be supported by the fact that a modern city has to have unique spirit as well as to be functional and comfortable for his citizens. In addition, if everyone use their own design, it will lead to dissonant in styles of buildings and charming of a city will be lost. For example, some old cities such as Prague are appealing because they have an authentic image and the spirit of ancient Europe.
However, letting people to choose the style of their dwelling have some benefits as well. If authorities let a constructor to decide which kind of a design to use, people will definitely come up with fresh ideas and it will probably change whole concept of a city. I consider it is highly beneficial because our society feels urgent demand in a new city where people and the nature will live in a peace. In order to conceive the environment, we need to change our way of life including our houses. To illustrate, concept of a green city with plants embedded into buildings cannot co-exist with idea having a traditional houses.
In conclusion, having consider both side of the argument I think that both side have their merits. However, advantage of having possibility to build house by themselves outweigh disadvantage of it. To keep both sides satisfied, it is suggested to put in place appropriate regulations in order to preserve historical part of a town and to let people to change the other part of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-24 | Mariamirabella | 73 | view |
- In many countries people now wear western clothes such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Nowadays young people know less about traditions and culture than in the past What are the reasons for it Is this a positive or negative development 65
- You left your watch at friend’s home. Write him a letter regarding this. 73
- Many people try to look younger than their age. What are the reasons people do this? Do you think this a good thing or a bad thing? 67
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'established'?
Suggestion: established
...e who believe that city image should be establish by architectural authorities. This idea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...image and the spirit of ancient Europe. However, letting people to choose the st...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ities let a constructor to decide which kind of a design to use, people will definitely c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'house'?
Suggestion: house
...co-exist with idea having a traditional houses. In conclusion, having consider both...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68996960486 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63198718594 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.300451508 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229709898343 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770471857523 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626282302879 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131199143273 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450354428458 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.