In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to?
In the current scenario, peoples' approach to using goods for the short span and then throw it
away is the matter of grave concern as it is affecting both the environment and society. I shall
outline the underlying causes and problems in this essay.
To begin with, there are umpteen reasons why individuals are following this trend. The primary
factor is due to the change in the lifestyle of humans. In the other words, every individual has
become very busy in the hustle and bustle of the life and they do not have time to repair things
if broken, so, instead of repairing it, they prefer to buy a new one. For example, if the screen of
any smartphone gets broken, people will buy a new phone, as it takes too much of their time
and money to go to the repair shop and get it repaired.
Moreover, these days, due to the increase in the competition, everything has become so
affordable that everyone wants to remain updated. For instance, every year, every consumer
company launches a variety of latest gadgets and that also at very affordable prices, so, people
upgrade themselves by buying new models.
There are a plethora of issues due to the throwaway attitude of humans. The main problem is
the threat to the environment. Due to the excessive production of goods to meet the public
demand, the natural resources are depleting day-by-day. To illustrate, to make new furniture,
businesses are cutting a large number of trees, which results in soil erosion and flash floods.
Furthermore, when the new product is created, there are some parts which cannot be recycled.
This possesses a great threat to nature, as, they cannot be decomposed easily and thus,
produce harmful gases. These harmful gases, in turn, cause serious health disorders in both
adults and children.
In conclusion, according to the above analysis, it is evident that every human has to change the
materialistic mentality, as there are multifarious serious consequences.
- As countries develop, people tend to buy more and more cars. Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment? 89
- You missed to attend friends invite. Write a letter to your friend:apologia for not comingexplain how did you try to contact him/herwhat is the alternate plan. 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 73
- Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both views and give your opinion 57
- you have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to a friend. In your letterexplain why you have moveddescribe the new placeinvite your friend to come and visit you. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 28, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ry consumer company launches a variety of latest gadgets and that also at very affordabl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 20, column 24, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... new furniture, businesses are cutting a large number of trees, which results in soil erosion an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66396040364 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6957630985 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120694176495 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360823550052 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039863913786 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0291372855393 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400343348208 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.