In many countries today, parents are able to choose to send their children to single-sex schools or co-educational schools. Some people think that going to single-sex schools has disadvantages later in life. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Currently, in ample countries all over the world, parents are capable of choosing the school type of their children, whether it will be a single-gender school or a co-educational one. It is believed by some people that, when children go to a single-sex school, some negative implications will occur in the future. I completely agree that one-gender schools have many drawbacks which influence the future life of the children.
Growing the children up in a single-sex school might impact their future social life. When the children, who have communicated with their same-sex for at least 12 years, start their university studying stage, this new life will be uncomfortable to them, albeit in society nature. Thus, this affects making new friends or emotional relations with the opposite sex. Hence, they will feel unbalanced emotionally. Many of them may take time to get used to this stage, and others will get stuck for a while. For example, research elucidates that 60% of university students, who were in a single-gender school, are less successful in their social life than the ones who were in a mixed school.
Single-sex schools will not affect only the social aspect of the children's lives, but also their career since they are not raised co-operating with different people, so this will reflect in their career. Boys and girls who were dealing with their same-sex in school activities will not harmonize smoothly with their different-sex co-workers when they will are adults. Therefore, their teamwork skill will deteriorate dramatically. For instance, a study reveals that employees who were in a co-educational school, communicate with their team better than the ones who were in a single-gender school.
To conclude, after analyzing these facts, it can not be denied that single-gender schools have worse repercussions on the future of the young youth on both social and practical sides.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-12-07 | Eslam Mobarak | 73 | view |
2020-12-07 | Eslam Mobarak | 73 | view |
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not well managed What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world 56
- In many countries today parents are able to choose to send their children to single sex schools or co educational schools Some people think that going to single sex schools has disadvantages later in life to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or remotely rather than going into an office each day Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Shopping is the favorite pastime for most of the young people Why do you think is that Do you think they should be encouraged to do some useful activities in their free time 73
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89705467635 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9831212795 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376492024393 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151979285398 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103818135109 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252778002594 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125534189896 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.