In many countries, the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happening? What will be the effects of it on family and society?
A family that eats together stays together, believed by most of the people. The habit of having food together with all family members are vanishing day by day. This essay will discuss the reasons for the same as well as its consequences on families and society.
In earlier days no matter what all the members of a house is doing, they used to have atleast one meal together, to bond, to discuss about what is going on and to handle basic issues. But along with the busy schedules and money making objective this ritual is getting vanished.
The major reason of this is that people now a days have so many tasks to perform on daily basis. To name a few, their jobs, travelling and other things. It is not wrong to say that family bonding exists but in very few areas. Home makers have their own tasks, fathers and brothers have their work and strict deadlines, children have their studies pressure. Everybody is busy with one thing or another. Most of the families send children out to study and get settle , so once in a while they get chance to sit together and talk.
If this will continue in the society then that day will not far when even living in a single house nobody is aware about what other member is up to. It is indeed an important thing to spend time together and solve each other problems and help them. Being independent in the society is definitely the need of an hour but that does not mean to forget basic values and morals. Inspite of jam packed timelines, family members should spend time so that everything will be sorted out and everyone will be happy. To prevail in today’s society, moral support is must and that can be only given by family.
- Fewer and Fewer people are choosing to become teachers. Why do young people not want to be teachers? How this could be changed. 61
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while other disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 67
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss about both views and give you opinion. 74
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss about both views and give you opinion. 56
- In many countries, the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happening? What will be the effects of it on family and society? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...The major reason of this is that people now a days have so many tasks to perform on daily ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...major reason of this is that people now a days have so many tasks to perform on daily ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...end children out to study and get settle , so once in a while they get chance to s...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey get chance to sit together and talk. If this will continue in the society then ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49836065574 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20956603584 2.80592935109 79% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4816527301 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312482190624 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868138495956 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540115432452 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178085250079 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550523935159 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.