Many countries want to host international sports events while other think that hosting sports events has more problems than benefits.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Games play a phenomenal role in our life as it inculcates various aptitude in participants as it also promotes physical as well as social growth. That is why many nations are keen to host multinational sporting events due to its fringe benefits, while many other opine this as these events can exploit conditions which are not favorable. Both the views are scrutinized before passing any conviction.
Tactically, International tournaments have the plethora of direct and indirect profits. Directly, hosting nations get a huge amount of money from the multinational federals which are used for the developments. As an illustration, Britain pays all the bills which are made to host the Commonwealth Games. Referring to indirect ways, tourism gets a boost which is beneficial for many private sectors. International visitors use their paid services by virtue of which they are able to earn huge profits. Eventually, they pay some parts as taxes which help finance authorities to increase its revenue.
It is evident that only one of the participating teams will win, but diaspora of losing team, as an outrage malice the public properties and few times, it becomes arduous to control them. Furthermore, plenty of internal affairs get unfolded by the inter countries media firms which make the catastrophic situation for the hosts. Crimes, such as lynching and theft, in Brasil during the Rio Olympics is worth mentioning here. On the top of it, terrorism is a curse for our society and many federals in the fear of it, do not want to host such tournaments.
Having dwelled on such thoughts, it is imperative to host international sports events as it is beneficial for the hosts and its citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-10 | Neelam Macwan | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | sndhuabhi | 78 | view |
- When visiting foreign countries some people think that it is an advantage to learn their culture and tradition How do you think people can learn other culture and tradition Why do you think that some people are interested in learning those tradition and c 42
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change Others believe that actions of individuals are wasteful and irrelevant and it is only government and large businesses that can make a difference Discuss both 84
- People spend too much on family celebrations such as birthdays and weddings?What are the importance of these celebration?Do you think people really spend too much? 61
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. 61
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nty of internal affairs get unfolded by the inter countries media firms which make the ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10394265233 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93047524355 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.31445712 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235847348373 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071900807646 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938091418739 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166807162341 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096928834584 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.