Many famous sports players advertise sports products. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In the contemporary era, the trend of endorsing the brands related to games by the prominent sportsmen has become quite popular. While this trend has some disadvantages, I strongly believe that the overall process has many advantages. This essay not only discusses the possible benefits like creating awareness to the people among particular products and also make them rich. Along with that, it also discusses the negative impacts like lack of concentration on the game and can mislead the public.
On one hand, campaigning about the athletic products by the celebrities in that respective field not only creates awareness for general people on how to use it, but also to make them purchase correct goods which are best suitable for them. For instance, advertising the gear which is used for tennis by famous celebrities in that area makes individuals aware of how to use them and make the proper choice when purchasing them. Along with that, players who endorse earn a lot of money. As for each brand publicity particular company pays around 25 to 50 crore rupees for the players. Additionally, these promotions make the famous too.
On the other hand, these brand promotions are making them lack concentration on the game which they are playing. Also, In the greed of earning money, many players are neglecting the sport and resulting in failure and losing the chance to play. For example, Although they get highly paid by the companies, they need to spend more time and effort on such campaigns which ultimately leads to the lack of focus and fitness to play. In addition to that, not using the products in the correct manner without having a proper idea because that was shown by the favourite sports person may cause adverse effects which might be life risk also.
Finally, promoting things related to sports may have some negative like misguiding and failure in the play. Alternatively, it also creates awareness among people and makes good revenue for people who promote it. This problem can be outweighed by having a good balance between the play and advertising, also they must be careful with products which they are promoting to avoid misguiding.
- Universities should allocate the same amount of money to students sports activities as they allocate to their libraries Do you agree 61
- Universities should allocate the same amount of money to students sports activities as they allocate to their libraries Do you agree 61
- Many famous sports players advertise sports products Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Universities should allocate the same amount of money to students sports activities as they allocate to their libraries Do you agree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
... make them purchase correct goods which are best suitable for them. For instance, advert...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...ng the gear which is used for tennis by famous celebrities in that area makes individuals aware of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...because that was shown by the favourite sports person may cause adverse effects which ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...dverse effects which might be life risk also. Finally, promoting things related t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
... Finally, promoting things related to sports may have some negative like misguiding ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0055401662 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58255547371 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540166204986 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1778088402 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9375 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140487106047 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485453033654 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488964399414 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850881804465 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208721493682 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.