Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages?”
Museums have historical and traditional importance in different communities. While some museums are charging fees admission, others are free-charge. This essay totally agrees that the Advantages of charging fees outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of charging fee entrance for museums.
On the positive side, charging fees to enter museums is really important for many life aspects such as education and entertainment. Collecting fees not only does help the government to look after museums but also it helps in developing it. Moreover, it gives the importance for such places; paying money for entrance allows only people who really care about the great value of these places. Furthermore, it provides developing countries with museums employees’ salaries, As a result of, budget shortage. For example, an article has been published by the Egyptian newspaper showed that imposing admission fees for the Egyptian museum helped the government to exceed the space of the museum.
On the negative side, fees which have been charged by governments in many countries created a gap between the rich and the poor. As high fees have shifted the balance from the hands of the masses to the hands of the few. However, museums are important for educational purposes and fun, unfortunately in developing countries, most people think more before paying fees to enter museums as they prefer to pay for essentials. For instance, in 2017, the Indian newspaper showed that the mass turnout decreased by 20 percent after setting a fee for the Indian museum.
In conclusion, Museums are places for cultures, arts, and education which helps us to broaden our horizons. Therefore, I totally agree that the advantages of charging people for entrance museums outnumber the disadvantages. It is recommended that balanced fees should be set for museums.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-06 | Shidbi | 92 | view |
| 2020-08-29 | rajarajalakshmi.k@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | Behnaz.babayani | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-01 | Sidan gigloo | 33 | view |
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 61
- Museums are places of cultural beauty and historical interest for many people. Some museums are open to public for free of charges. On the other hand, many museums set a fixed entrance fee. In my opinion, the benefits of charging entrance fee at museums o 56
- People prefer to communicate through social media and internet rather than face-to-face meetings. Is this positive or negative? 78
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 67
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed a gap between the rich and the poor. As high fees have shifted the balance from...
^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alanced fees should be set for museums.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39189189189 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90471393406 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543918918919 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2910847254 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426888639877 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146493493152 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851479328421 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277217657622 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384963723196 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.