Many people believe that road quality safety will be improved when the government will decrease the speed limit, other people believe that there are other ways of improving road safety.
Discuss both views and give your opinion. Provide some examples from your own experience to support your answer.
Throughout the last decade, road safety standards in some countries have undergone dramatic changes. Furthermore, many people are convinced that government can positively influence this tremendous problem by reducing the existing speed limit. Nevertheless, there is a significant amount of opponents conceding that it can be achieved via implementation of miscellaneous of other norms and regulations. This essay will argue that the quality of road safeness can be improved by implementing a number of stringent restrictions.
One the one hand, road safeness can drastically be improved due to the legislation inducing the speed limit. In other words, the government can adopt a low by which allowed speed will be abated. For instance, German's government instilled discipline in citizens through the set of strict regulations persuading drivers to be more obedient. As a result, the level of accidents has been reduced substantially. Therefore, it is clearly seen that road safety in some countries can dramatically be enhanced if the government adopts a law regulating the speed limit.
Alternatively, it is argued that this obvious measure is not efficient and entirely preposterous. That is to say, that a vast number of specialists believe that more drastic steps including a significant increase in vehicles taxes and prices, should be employed. It can be illustrated by the paper published by Dr. John Watson, a world-renowned expert, which reveals statistic that there has been a sharp decline in the number of car accidents in countries where cars prices and taxes have been increased. Thus, this example shows that by rising private transport related costs the government will impact the quantity of cars, which in turn, can reduce the number of road detrimental incidents.
Concluding, stringent measures in regulating road safety can be tremendously efficient. In my opinion, if the government does not adopt a set of stringent laws to decrease the number of cars on streets, the road safeness crucial issue will continue to be deleterious for the global community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | marasheed1763@gmail.com | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41846153846 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1372154389 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3785699329 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.4 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289686731074 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978407263494 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638398114571 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183658969172 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625345293031 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.