Many people feel that most of the urgent problems can only be solved by international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary global landscape, many pressing issues such as climate change, international disasters like floods, and pandemic like COVID-19 requires international collaboration. These challenges are not limited to one particular country and are massive in nature and requires significant global efforts. I wholeheartedly agree with this phenomenon that there should be a borderless approach to mitigate the issues and prevent them surface again.
One compelling argument is the interconnectedness of these challenges. For instance, climate change, and greenhouse gas emissions are a global challenge and it has repercussions worldwide. Countries sharing oceans, waterfalls, and the atmosphere should be considerate enough to focus on a multilateral approach to problems such as flooding or pollution. A unilateral approach would be impractical and counterproductive.
Another vivid example is the pandemic Covid-19. The collective effort of producing a vaccine, distribution, and awareness campaign across the globe helped overcome the challenge amicably. This determines that global challenges require collaborative efforts and isolated solutions and approaches would bounce back.
Some may argue that collaborative efforts may underscore conflict of interest. While this argument is valid in its sense, some issues only require conclusive and collective solutions. Those solutions work for greater benefits and can undertake the loss of some individual benefits.
I would like to recapitulate I reiterate that global emergency issues have the best solutions with collective efforts. They can be sought amicably without border hindrances. When handling international crises, nations must realize the interdependencies and rationalize that ever-lasting and meaningful effort effective to all mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-15 | Amna Zeeshan | 61 | view |
- 6 You found a piece of lost luggage with someone s belongings labeled with their name and address Write a letter to the owner In your letter describe the luggage you found explain where you found it suggest how the owner could get it back 73
- 1 Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society today How important is it for people who want to succeed in life Is it a positive or negative characteristic 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...pproaches would bounce back. Some may argue that collaborative efforts may undersco...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20634920635 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41777031748 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623015873016 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6602760959 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934922737702 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028322142355 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320305522729 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490558838892 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289146254498 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.41 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.44 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.