Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms. Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
In this contemporary world, interaction and communication between people have been altered drastically with the advancement in technology. Therefore, some advocate the view of making friends through micro blogging sites, while others are against it. On the whole, I partially agree with this statement.
To begin with, friends play an essential role in people's life in some form or the other, and thus social sites facilitate people to make friends easily which in turn result many strong outcomes. Firstly, social networking sites have brought this entire world at a one place, where anyone can make friends, irrespective of any boundary and limitation as a result communication gap has been narrowed between people, thereby easier to find like minded people. On the top of that, social sites enable people to make friends safely and in a good way, as people become friends and meet each other after better understanding. For instance, it has been found that people, who lack in confidence while having personal interaction, can have better friends and communication through social sites.
On the contrary, the bedrock of friendship is based on truth, values and mutual understanding, hence it can only be ensured when people have an interaction personally, which in turn prove that there are myriad negative aspects of making friends on social sites. Very first, one cannot get real picture about the person who is in social sites, as many people make fake accounts and apply morph pictures, which result sometime fraud and other disappointments. In addition, friends by social sites can be a prime source of distraction for the young mind, which may sometime lead them towards untoward conditions.
In conclusion, I opine that social sites have both sides, positive and negative, therefore people should use it for their development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | harmankaur | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
| 2017-10-25 | jay.patel.4545 | 74 | view |
- Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience. 100
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 100
- Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both the views and give your opinion 88
- Overweight in many countries is a common problem and citizens’ health and fitness level is also decreasing. What are the causes of this problem and what could be done to tackle this problem? 100
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... sites, while others are against it. On the, I partially agree with this statement. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the contrary, the bedrock of friendship based on truth, values and mutual unders...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31944444444 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77818573393 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2644299865 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.272727273 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307450641673 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130279831643 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693925306473 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180111282249 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780096611657 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.