Many people now live in societies where comsumer goods have become cheap.
Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?
The widespread usage of low cost products by people all around the world has become a frequent subject of debate in today’s life. This alarming trend has a number of pore and cons. However, for some reasons that I will discuss through this essay, I believe the advantages are more than disadvantages.
To begin with, if we take the view that all people has the right to use any things that they want, it is logical to defend the idea of less expensive products. Foods, as an illustrative example, is one of the main needs of individuals. The more cheap ingredients, result in more quality of meals, and even the number of meals. According to statistics, nowadays, more than one portion of the world population is suffering from starvation. Another example is clothes which is a vivid example of consumer goods. As a matter of fact, cheaper goods means less budget on consuming products, while more money could allocated for education or recreational activities such as traveling.
On the other hand, lower price of goods might encourage overexploitation. Materialism trend poses some serious threat to the world. Environmental damages will always be considered as a drawback which causes some major problems. To illustrate, production of cheap furniture needs more consuming materials such as wood or iron. To meet the demand of market, manufacturers have to exploit more natural resources such as forest or mines. In a long term prospective, the dearth of resources will be a significant concern.
In conclusion, all mentioned points lead to a concrete foundation which indicates that while production of cheaper products brings a new set of concerns, it is also true to say that there are more perks associated with this trend. Given this situation, it seems that government should prepared a solid plan to prevent those potential problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-10 | yaldaasgari | 11 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | yaldaasgari | 11 | view |
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work shopping and education To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Write a letter to an overseas fiend and invite him her to a party that you arrange Please say What is the reason for the party Give details of the party Suggest an arrangement for your friend 75
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...mer goods. As a matter of fact, cheaper goods means less budget on consuming products...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 609, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'allocate'
Suggestion: allocate
...suming products, while more money could allocated for education or recreational activitie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90922659426 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8995392934 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.068400762834 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196640728962 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226152295796 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398892563922 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251947227039 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.