many people spoil natural beauties like sea ,beaches ,mountains and lakes .do people responsible for that ?what should be done to stop people to spoil natural beauty ?give the reasons and examples for your answer.
While the problem of littering is common in many parts of the environment, the impact it has on the natural landscape when it occurs in places of natural beauty is even greater, both in terms of the direct environmental impact and aesthetic quality of the site.
There are various possible reasons why littering might occur. It might be caused by visitors to the area who have no interest in maintaining the beauty of the landscape, or lack environmental consciousness regarding the damage they are inflicting. It may also be the case that it is not the actual visitors to the place, but others who are actively dumping garbage at the site as opposed to disposing of it in the recommended manner. Another cause could be the transfer of waste materials from surrounding areas. This can be caused by garbage being deposited in a river upstream from a lake, for example, and the current then transports the garbage and eventually deposits it at a different location. Wind can also be responsible, especially in the case of plastic bags, which can be carried by the wind over considerable distances before becoming trapped. The plastic bags may actually have been carelessly disposed of in another location originally.
With regard to solving this problem, the first step should be to determine the exact source of the garbage; whether it is primarily from visitors to the site, or it has been displaced from another location, and has imply accumulated at the site. Once the source and cause of the garbage have been clearly identified, then the necessary action needs to be taken to wipe out any possibility of recurrence. This might involve imposing fines for individuals for dumping garbage, deploying more waste receptacles, or resolving a problem in another location which is contributing to garbage being displaced to the site in question.
The accumulation of garbage can be controlled, either through better waste management, clean up operations, or penalties to deter those who might litter at such sites. However, in terms of littering laws, these already exist; therefore, there may be need for stricter enforcement of existing littering laws, with offenders being severely fined or compelled to clean up their garbage or participate in community service projects to cleanse the afflicted area.
- zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to natural environment. Discuss some arguments for and /or against keeping animals in zoo. 67
- Nowadays,international tourism is the biggest industry in the world unfortunately it creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- 1-NOWADAYS , THE GAP BETWEEN COUNTRYSIDE AND CITY SIDE HAS BEEN INCREASING WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE REASON AND HOW COULD IT BE RESOLVED ? 73
- many people spoil natural beauties like sea beaches mountains and lakes do people responsible for that what should be done to stop people to spoil natural beauty give the reasons and examples for your answer 93
- People should look after their health as a duty to the society where they live, rather than their own benefits. What extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'implied'.
Suggestion: implied
...isplaced from another location, and has imply accumulated at the site. Once the sourc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for example, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14588859416 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86817750074 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533156498674 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6366105817 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.230769231 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115770076807 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418441075472 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300473983102 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754351662729 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225308034888 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.