Many people today find it difficult to balance the demands of their work and personal life What are the causes of this situation and what can individuals and employers do to reduce the problem

In modern society, the hectic lifestyle has confronted people with a constant struggle between their work necessities and private life. There are a number of underlying causes and effective ways to address them effectively.

Perhaps the root cause can be traced in modern lifestyle which is highly pressurized, with people are expected to strenuously work for an extended period. This means there would be little or even no free time to spend with their family or to relax freely, leading progressively to a considerable feeling of anxiety. Furthermore, the second origin of this phenomenon could stem from the increasing demands to have a luxury life, with some families are more inclined to have expensive car, house, and furniture. This is a significant factor which clearly condemns people to raise their working hours and to earn more money.

Turning to the effective solutions, the most immediate and practical proposition for the employers would be to incorporate a fixed amount of time into their workers` schedules. This could be an alleviating factor, especially when combined with offering subsidized leisure pursuits by the employers, as it can consequently preserve family time. A further key step might be for the government to increase annual wages, perks, and even financial rewards by which the workers are able to improve their standards of private life. Finally, the individuals and family members should request reasonably from their parents, hopefully contributing to reduce the exorbitant and unnecessary expenses involved in the family budget, and thus decline the financial burden on families.

Overall, the potential causes originate from the rigid work schedules and unnecessary purchases involved in routine overheads. However, a coordinated response by individuals, employers and the state can ultimately mitigate the situation.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, second, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5649122807 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94457678989 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4577261262 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176117378628 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660398012866 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320004588338 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10952279583 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252968082504 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.