Many people today use their phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages?
Today utilisation of smartphones for texting and messaging has become more popular than for talking. There are a few noticeable reasons for this development. However, disadvantages of this trend overweight its benefits.
First of all, modern times force people to be concerned about spending their time efficiently. Fast pace of life, busy work hours do not let people have proper conversations with their relatives, friends and co-workers by phone. Therefore, convenient method of communication, such as messaging, has become so popular nowadays. Sending a message, checking a messenger, answering with a picture require less efforts and time than talking by phone. In addition, text messages are cheaper than phone calls. Almost all mobile companies provide their customers with an unlimited Internet connection and give a free package of text messages. Indeed, convenience and low prise of messaging have changed the way of people's communication.
Nevertheless, a widespread distribution of messengers has a few serious drawbacks. Firstly, people tend to use short words, slang or symbols in their texts and this can lead to poor language among the youngsters. Secondly, messages cannot show sender's emotions or attitudes so this can cause some misunderstanding and following relationship problems. Finally, it is believed that chatting through messengers and social media limit people interactions and can make them isolated from family members and friends. In fact, this modern trend has more disadvantages than advantages.
In conclusion, although messengers allow people to chat faster, cheaper and more efficient than though phone calls, this improvement has some negative effects on the society, such as poor quality of language, individual's isolation and loneliness.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-28 | Bhawna Sharma | 78 | view |
2019-11-04 | enassar | 84 | view |
2019-09-30 | Faraj.khalikov | 89 | view |
2019-07-20 | Annie123 | 89 | view |
2019-07-06 | Tinatintin | 75 | view |
- Your friend is about to celebrate a landmark birthday and would welcome suggestions as to how is should be celebrated. Write a letter to your friend. Say what type of party should be held e.g themed,fancy dress,black tie event. Suggest a suitable venue. 67
- Many people today use their phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...enger, answering with a picture require less efforts and time than talking by phone....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69172932331 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0735882009 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676691729323 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6286861814 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390086263311 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11386140424 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108752521518 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232244940955 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11590700693 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.