Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Under the competitive work environment nowadays, employees are having a hectic schedule at work every day while enjoying limited room for their personal lives. Although working days and nights has its benefits, the harms it created outweigh the goods. This essay will elaborate the reasons behind.
Admittedly, people can be benefited from spending more time at their companies. For some employees, they can accumulate more wealth as their remuneration depends on the actual working hours. In other words, some people get paid when they work. Also, some bankers in top financial institutions like J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley prefer to work diligently to secure their place in the companies. Workers can obtain both job security and income. However, the setbacks of devoting themselves into work only may offset or even undermine the benefits.
Health issues, both physical and emotional, are one of the major negative impacts brought by extended working hours. If people have sufficient time off, they can spend causal time with friends and families on activities like sports and lunch gatherings. These events not only help people relieve their stress, but also help them develop a healthy lifestyle. Recent research done by the government attested that citizens who spent hours in their offices tend to have illnesses like liver cancer and depression due to the lack of exercise and high level of stress. This implies that people can suffer a high health cost despite their intention to gain more money from work. High level of stress leads to mental exhaustion which could also affects people's work performances. Working intensively can also affect job security and income negatively.
To recapitulate, spending excessive hours at work could be a way to increase income; however, the drawbacks it created can hardly be ignored and can eventually affect its benefits. People should strive for work-life balance in order to gain from both work and personal moments, healthily and wealthily.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-24 | Wajeeha Umer | 73 | view |
2019-12-11 | TheWeirdPotato | 67 | view |
2019-12-02 | angchams | 73 | view |
2019-10-24 | TDuyen | 56 | view |
2019-10-24 | Sohaibkq | 61 | view |
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development? 78
- There have been several complaints about the reception area where visitors to your company arrive. Your manager has asked you to suggest how the reception area could be improved. Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:-Describe the complaints that 78
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion? 78
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay will elaborate the reasons behind. Admittedly, people may be benefited from...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to work only may offset the benefits. Health issues, both physical and emotion...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k performance and hence job security. In conclusion, spending hours at work ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35458167331 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58937172975 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649402390438 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0433377444 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204660684896 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700292312261 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456467211804 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125608444442 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334364507633 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.