In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?
Today, to expand residential areas, a large fraction of remote regions has been demolished. Although some individuals believe that such areas should be preserved, a few people opine that because of the population’s rise and limited space, it is unavoidable. I personally agree with the former view and discuss my reasons in the following.
As for some reasons, firstly, a wide range of animal specious most probably will become extinct. As a matter of fact, different groups of animals such as herbivores, wild animals and a variety of birds specious have been living in the bushes in the suburb. Therefore, by destroying countryside, they will lose their habitats. Furthermore, the destruction of rural areas would extremely exacerbate the global warming. To illustrate this vividly, Vegetation coverage especially, different sorts of trees have an important role to regulate air temperature. In fact, during the process of photosynthesis, trees adsorb Co2, the significant cause of the global warming, and eventually release H2O and oxygen which makes the air atmosphere cool and humid.
Nevertheless, some others believe that the authorities should utilize the landscapes to construct new buildings. To support their ideas, they mention that the population is on the rise, and thus to accommodate people, and avoid congestion, such natural places should be used. Although this might be true to some extent, they should not be overlooked how important can be to protect the environment. Furthermore, the governments can build more and more high-rise apartments and skyscrapers in the cities. In this way, more people are able to settle on them.
To conclude, although the authorities should provide citizens accommodation, they also should do their best to keep our environment as preserving them is vital for survival all alive organisms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Niharika rani | 78 | view |
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money What others factors contribute towards happiness 67
- Languages are dying out all the time The result of this is a world with fewer languages This is a good thing for people everywhere To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- IELTS writing sample The school library is seeking applicants for a job over summer break Write a letter to the library s manager in your letter include A brief introduction of yourself Your experience and relevant skills Why you want the job 78
- You ordered an item from an online store and it has arrived damaged Write a letter to the retailer to complain In the letter Explain why you are unhappy Request a refund Make arrangements to return the damaged item
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vital for survival all alive organisms.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as for, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42013888889 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03375866663 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628472222222 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2657935197 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147353705589 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046508867095 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499855996527 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771876415625 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060392304646 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.