Nowadays, the advent of technology has revolutionized all bearings of life, from production to transportation, media, etc.. Everything has become automated under the buttons. This has largely dispensed with the need for manually working, especially housework which is now no longer a big obsession for many people coming home after a long busy day from workplaces. This essay will prove that the merits of this advancement outweigh its drawbacks.
It is common knowledge that machines in daily work are playing a greater and greater role which is undeniable on human life. First and foremost, it's very time-saving and convenient, instead of taking a lot of time and effort to do housework we can utilize them in other imperative tasks. For instance, by using electronic devices such as washing machine, vacuum cleaner, and dishwasher at home, women can now save more of their precious time with family, in particular, strengthen bonds between family members as well as custody of their children. Individuals can complete work in less time, with more efficiently. Their workloads will be also dramatically reduced so they can spend time to rejuvenate themselves. Accordingly, the quality of work is improved with a high precision. Considering it’s machinery works. For example, because machines work more accurately than humans, the home equipment like the screwdriver, mixer grinder, juice maker does the work more accurately.
Nonetheless, a tremendous demerit of using machines for house tasks is that the development of labor saving devices has ‘contributed’ quite a lot to obesity, especially among housewives. According to the research by the University of Manchester and Royal Holloway University the average female now spends almost 20 percent less time on chores than her counterpart in the early 1980s. Advances in technology with labor-saving appliances such as microwave ovens, dishwashers have helped women work less, and the implications are that their growing waistlines are growing. Consequently, this arises different health issues like obesity, heart and muscular pains among people who rely on machines.
To sum up, everything is like a corn having two sides similarly machines have both good and bad sides. It’s up to us to decide and practice using machines at home with most cautions and balance. Machines at home can make our lives more comfortable and convenient, but the act of considering the cost of health is recommended.”
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...production to transportation, media, etc.. Everything has become automated under t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, nonetheless, similarly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in particular, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42487046632 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12807501263 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616580310881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2877269274 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.210526316 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13601155034 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354675779427 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312107233281 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758382097469 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162789233817 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.