Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages

Nowadays several household chores and tasks are performed through machines, in comparison to past when people used to do work manually. This advancement in technology provides many benefits in contrast to drawbacks to people, who are using these devices on regular basis.

Firstly, these electronic devices are more convenient for doing housework. Devices like, washing machine, vacuum cleaner, microwave, blenders, choppers etc. have made life easier for women as well as men working in domestic environment. They save time, give better results than tasks performed by hand. These machines can be used by anyone with little guidance for example; teenagers and young people who were dependent on their parents before for small household tasks can now perform in a more efficient manner. Elderly person, people with some kind of disability, can finish their work without relying on anyone. Time saved because of these machines can be utilized in other productive activities, for example, mothers can concentrate more on upbringing of their children.

On the other hand, usage of electronic devices and too much dependence can make people lazy. Performing daily routine chores by hand helps people to be fit and healthy. Another drawback of this technology is affordability, not everyone have enough money to buy these devices. It's not only purchasing of an item but amount energy and electricity required to run these is not easy on everyone's pocket. Lastly, when they are used by children without any supervision might lead to dangerous accidents, causing fatal injuries.

In the end, due to technology leap in this era people have made their lives easy by developing devices and using them efficiently, but this leisure time has made them inactive, which results in health issues. One should use this machinery in moderate manner along with tasks done manually.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (5 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, well, for example, in contrast, kind of, as well as, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33108108108 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6304879327 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631756756757 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8555868733 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174313477538 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520017207812 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436522044513 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105532114631 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223638775727 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.