Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?

The use of machines for household activities is becoming increasingly popular these days. While the use of such technologies relief us from putting extra effort, but welcomes to different health issues. Though these machines throw us into many problems, but it cannot outweigh the benefit we derive.

Being constantly dependent on appliances affects our health. Machines makes human lazy by solving the effort one needs to put in order to complete a work. People in older times were more fit and healthy. According to a recent study, a majority of the human population is suffering from obesity, diabetes and a lot more because they are relying on machines to fulfill their daily needs. These prove that development due to the machine is not beneficial.

In spite of having severe consequences, I feel using machines have their own advantages if we use them properly. In order to keep pace with the fast-growing society, people cannot spend time to do household chores. Machines help them to achieve this within a short span of time, thus gives ample time to concentrate on career, job or other important goals. It has been observed that a smart home is very easy to maintain than a home with lots of manual work. I feel that the introduction of machines to solve work done is a positive side of development.

Electronic companies are investing an ample amount to build machines that will ease our daily housework. Though being completely relying on machines affects health, but such uses have their own advantages. In conclusion, I feel that development on part of machines to help in our daily household chores are extremely beneficial to humans.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...pular these days. While the use of such technologies relief us from putting extra effort, bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, i feel, in conclusion, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01449275362 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73837310288 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61231884058 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8197886917 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137937370836 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438815885658 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288526137233 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770513004576 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234195137039 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.