It is often debated that a country's governing body should bear the costs for education of students who enroll in focussed specialized on-demand study program and provide no assistance to other less in demand study program. This essay will firstly discuss the advantages of such a benefit and followed with drawbacks of this approach and culminating with a rationalized conclusion.
One major benefit that arises from this method is an focussed resource development in targeted fields. This drastically helps in advancement and a faster evolution of the focussed area. With abundant highly skilled students graduating out with the help of government aid results in higher number of specialized workers joining the workforce. Such a workforce is highly productive and requires less to none initial training upon employment. This is huge benefit to the employers as these workforce start contributing from Day one. For example, school aid and scholarship programs were offered by Government of California in 1960 to the students enrolling in computer chip related studies, which led to significant accelerated development in field of micro-processors.
The biggest disadvantage that stems out of this approach is partial imbalanced development of society. A company is a multi-level and multi-dimension operating entity. It doesn't only need the focussed students that are specialized in selected fields only, but rather also other employees who can contribute in other non-specialized domains. This approach creates a partial empty void that has to be filled somehow directly or indirectly. This leads to outsourcing of such fields where less talented pool is available and is major aspect offsetting the economic balance in the company. As an example, a survey done in 2010 by Times Job found 90% of manufacturing jobs are now outsourced out of USA.
To conclude, the drawbacks outweigh the advantages as seen from above points as this would create a partially imbalanced society which does not benefit overall development of a society.
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences.Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion 56
- With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with.What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 61
- It is generally believed that the Internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...benefit that arises from this method is an focussed resource development in target...
^^
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this workforce' or 'these workforces'?
Suggestion: this workforce; these workforces
...his is huge benefit to the employers as these workforce start contributing from Day one. For ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nd multi-dimension operating entity. It doesnt only need the focussed students that ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42902208202 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10321279387 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586750788644 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5158281026 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119217773516 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333428902615 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479396862277 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737863801196 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396042133532 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.