Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree
At this moment in time the government are constructing a lot of infrastructures. Using finances in right meaningful way which I agree to this notion because a lot of people will benefit from this advancement.
To start with, creating new public building is a positive way to invest most of the funds the government are earning. For example, in the Philippines the current president and his cabinet members are already pushing for the massive infrastructure plan he devise. New public highways, land-ports and city halls have been erected due to this motive of the incumbent politicians. The masses can use this public transportation building to mitigate their problems when it comes to traveling to different parts of the country. It would also give the masses the sense of fulfillment they were craving for in past few years.
In addition, Money that have been spent in this kind of way can give forth trust of the public to their legislators. Which in time can also bolster the sense of security and camaraderie in that nation. Moreover building a lot of museum and library could help young individuals in their education specifically in doing their homework. It could ease up the burden of the students on how they could finish their work. As well as the learning materials that they could borrow and for their references in school and in their home.
In conclusion, I emphatically agree to the notion hat investing money into building public infrastructure could bolster the country’s economy. It would also improve way of living of their people in their daily activities.
- Having no money makes people unhappy others are not happy having a lot of money Discuss both views and give your opinion 25
- Your friend has asked you about the course details you recently did in a training centre. Explain about the course details, why should your friend take this course and how has the course benefitted you. 73
- You have the opportunity to visit a foreign country for two weeks. Which country would you like to visit? 61
- Write a letter to friend inviting on family function. what is the occasion, what are your plans and why is it important that she should come. 56
- You have a friend who lives in a city abroad You have decided that you would like to apply to do a course at one of the colleges in this city Write to your friend explaining what you would like to do Tell him her what type of work or studies you have been 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'devises'.
Suggestion: devises
... for the massive infrastructure plan he devise. New public highways, land-ports and ci...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ecurity and camaraderie in that nation. Moreover building a lot of museum and library co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun museum seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of museums'.
Suggestion: a lot of museums
...derie in that nation. Moreover building a lot of museum and library could help young individual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...references in school and in their home. In conclusion, I emphatically agree to t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02651515152 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90565364721 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0807527511 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0865854036972 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031065420169 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036535508614 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518110415256 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199514704034 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.