Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is often debatable, whether Govt. funds should be spent on building new infrastructure, for instance museums and town halls, or in refurbishing the old ones. I believe that renovating existing structures will help in saving money and preserving our rich culture. So, this essay will discuss these boons in detail.

Creating new public architecture will cost more money to the government. However, revamping the old construction will save that extra expense. This will save the funds which can further be allocated to more serious concerns. To cite an example, countries like India have more crucial matters where money could be spent. Funds should be invested in upgrading education system, curb poverty and in creating more employment for the youth.

Moreover, culture of a country is very well represented by their old monuments, forts, museums etc. Reconditioning these treasures will further exhort tourism and will aid in economic development of a country. This will also increase the employment opportunities for the locals. To exemplify, more chefs, hotel managers, travel guides and tour guides will be in demand. Thus, preserving culture serve many benefits.

In winding up, It seems that governments will save unnecessary expenses and can spend funds on more deserving areas as well as save their cultural heritage.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 LOVELEEN 56 view
2019-04-01 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-04-01 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-01-27 H1TCH0130 56 view
Essays by user LOVELEEN :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 209.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43062200957 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81757655908 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645933014354 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0844012328 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6666666667 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9333333333 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15588373272 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546825215045 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776027859655 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976722824544 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089592594049 0.056905535591 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.