More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news articles and stories. Some people think that photographs are not a reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutable. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In this contemporary era, people are able to know about the world by just a tap on a phone as there are various platforms allowed to share news all around the world such as newspapers, news channels and online bulletins. Some of the facts argue that photographs on those media platforms are morphed images. However, some people do not agree with this notion. According to my opinion, photographs are not trustworthy at some point as they are not completely reliable sources. This essay shall analyze both views and will provide appropriate evidence for it.
Needless to say, photographs in the news bulletin or news channels make the news interesting for the readers. First and foremost, people can understand the news by just looking at images and it makes it interesting so people would love to read news with enthusiasm. For example, If there is news about any award show or any other important function then people would prefer to see the images rather than reading about that. Along with that, eye-capturing images make perfect sense to articles as people tend to remember graphics or visuals more than any sesquipedalian articles.
On the other hand, Due to the evolution of technology, there is a variety of software available that can distort the images and can lead to misleading news. For example, Photoshop and Illustrator are the software that allows modification of the images and people can misuse this software. On top of that, there are several scenarios to be considered that can justify this notion that a picture can be fake to be considered as evidence. For instance, using online tools to create fake pictures is so easy and people should not completely rely on the images because there is no guarantee of authenticity.
To conclude, Images can make articles interesting enough to attract readers and can be used as proof of evidence. However, people should not blindly follow the images as it is not reliable and cannot assure genuineness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-09 | krishyparms | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-05 | sheetal01 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | A VATSAL KUMAR | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that hosting International sports events is highly beneficial whereas others think it is creating problems for the host country Discuss both the views 74
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it 73
- Map shows construction of 2014 and planning of 2020 80
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 82
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this contemporary era, people are able to know about the world ...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...rs, news channels and online bulletins. Some of the facts argue that photographs on those m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99696048632 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71901785271 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51367781155 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5670912057 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282394128327 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946630415864 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707124976172 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15912954159 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714394916664 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.