Despite humans have been dressing for thousands of years humans, it is only in recent years that clothing has shifted from the basic function of providing warmth and protection. These days clothing has gained so much importance that wearing fashionable clothes seems to be a priority to some people. This essay will examine therefore the pros and cons related to this latest trend.
Although the concept of outer appearance has been around for thousands of years, our ancestors were simply struggling to survive at a time when clothes had only the purpose to protect them from harsh weather conditions. Nevertheless, even in that remote age humans were aware of the importance of dressing code. Leaders and wealthy individuals loved to show their status to the rest of the society and clothes were a formidable weapon to strike the attention of the community. Nowadays society has undergone deep changes, but many feel driven to wear expensive items, apparently with the simple aim to flaunt. Social and business experts, and even scientist have often underpinned how the dress code can make the difference when it come to applying for a job or to selling products. In such a case, putting on the appropriate dress is pivotal to gain respect or to persuade the audience. Clothes transmit authority, professionalism, self-confidence, and trust. Obviously, a dress itself cannot bridge a gap and supersede experience, but it can help to make a good impression on clients, potential employers, and colleagues.
Conversely to the positive aspects mentioned above, these days some people tend to follow a futile trend, according to the only way to be successful is to wear fashionable clothes. If once wearing high-priced, were considered a luxury, these days it is something many believe have a right to and therefore, something to be actively pursued. This attitude is frankly pointless and ultimately does not seem to have advantages. It is only a gross attempt to show off and to look on other people who can afford to waste money in futile goods.
In conclusion, if it is true that clothes unveil a great deal about the personality, claiming that wearing in fashion clothes is essential to gain respect, success, and esteem is a blatant understatement. No dress, however fancy, can actually cover incompetence, indifference, and arrogance.
- Some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness Do you think people can be happy without much money what other factors contribute towards happiness 56
- The increase in people s life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start to work at a younger age Is this alternative a positive or negative development 47
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building Do you agree or disagree
- Junk food advertising has a harmful effect on society and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun feel seems to be countable; consider using: 'many feels'.
Suggestion: many feels
...society has undergone deep changes, but many feel driven to wear expensive items, apparen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 733, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...ss code can make the difference when it come to applying for a job or to selling pro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...potential employers, and colleagues. Conversely to the positive aspects mentioned above...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, conversely, frankly, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14921465969 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94171075742 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589005235602 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1534868005 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.705882353 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161927362814 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465002272544 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557525051865 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102030170141 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026622956202 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.