In most countries it is commonplace to allow eighteen-year-old to get a driving license. However, concerns have risen about this trend resulting in proposals calling for permitting driving only for people older than 25 years. In a world where governments allow young to enjoy the military or have a gun even when they are 17, I find these concerns totally out of place. In this essay therefore I will briefly examine the possible reasons hidden behind this issue and try to convince you that driving is not a matter of age but a matter of ability.
To underpin the statement that only who is older than 25 should take a driving license, the supporters of this line base their opinion on an unproven idea that has been around for centuries: young are basically driven by emotions and love risks. Well, although there could be some seeds of truth in this statement, it is not a valid reason to forbid 18-year-olds to start driving. According to several studies, the percentage of teenagers involved in crash accidents is still high. Auto accidents are sadly the leading cause of death for teens ages 15 to 20. A strong point for those who claim driving should be allowed after the 25. There are however some aspects it is worth shedding a light on. What statistics also say, is that the most accidents happen due to inexperience, distraction, and consumption of alcohol. If we take a closer look to these points, what it comes out as a result is that postponing the legal driving age to 25 would be no solution.
To begin with, inexperience is not just a matter of age. Let us imagine this way: two guys one aged 18 and the other one 25 try for the first time to drive. No one has a previous experience so the outcome will be probably the same. Both of them are going to make some mistakes. This is completely normal and due not to the age itself, but to the lack of experience. Paradoxically, a 18-year-old by the age of 25 will have roughly gained seven years driving experience. Going on to the second point, distractions, we can find that texting, mailing, or watching videos while driving are harmful habits spread in a large percentage of drivers, without regard for age. Third, based on data from traffic accidents, alcohol-impaired crashes are largely caused by drivers in their 30s.
In conclusion, in the light of the considerations above, raising the legal driving to 25 would ensure no benefits at all. What really prevent auto accidents are safe roads, proper signage, reliable cars, and intensive training. Driving examiners should also play a pivotal role in this scheme before handing over the car key to teens who could not yet be fully prepared to overcome the obstacles they have to face up when at the wheel.
- In many countries plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organization To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Provocative adverts have no place in a civilized society 95
- More people are spending their free time watching movies Why is this Is it a good thing or bad thing 89
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised to access to the internet in order to meet and chat with their friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations What solutions can you suggest to deal w 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'try' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...o guys one aged 18 and the other one 25 try for the first time to drive No one has ...
^^^
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e largely caused by drivers in their 30s In conclusion in the light of the consid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, look, really, second, so, still, therefore, third, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59290187891 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56015106107 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538622129436 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 479.0 20.2975951904 2360% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2200.0 106.682146367 2062% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 479.0 20.7667163134 2307% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 145.0 7.06120827912 2053% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351214076023 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.351214076023 0.084324248473 417% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197687063165 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286339287031 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 239.7 13.0946893788 1831% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -406.25 50.2224549098 -809% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 188.9 11.3001002004 1672% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.82 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.82 8.58950901804 359% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 9.78957915832 552% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 193.6 10.1190380762 1913% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 10.7795591182 288% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.