News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
Nowadays, with the invent of technology, ways of broadcasting information through TV and Newspaper have been changed. It is believed by a section of people that pictorial approach of news is very attractive and informative than other methods. In my opinion, this method is more effective and i'll support with my view and valid arguments with examples.
To begin with, firstly, this development provides benefit to the illiterate people who cannot read words. However, it assists them to get accurate information and knowledge easily about the various aspects which lead to giving them more respect in the society. To illustrate, elderly persons basically get knowledge of TV and understand the content of news just from pictures in a newspaper. Then they share their views in several meetings. Moreover, it is also beneficial for the children to make a hobby of reading the newspaper and watching news channels on TV, it helps to children in a very informative way. All and sundry know that children attract towards images, movements and colour which are helpful for them to learn quickly.
Apart from the above, there are some social aspects which cannot be denied which are exposed by displaying pictures and documentaries on Television such as smoking and drug addiction. To exemplify, in words, it becomes a juggernaut task to tell the public about the harmful effects of smoking, however with the help of some aids people understand easily. Another additional benefit of this development is that it boosts up the employment opportunities for the public sector in the news agencies and news channels, in the department of animation and media.
In conclusion, I reckon that including pictures in news can play a pivotal role in gaining the reader’s attention to a particular topic. Pictures can also tell a story more vividly and make comprehension easier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Kaupo199 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | berryabhisheksn | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | mansoureh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | PK_18 | 56 | view |
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Other thinks that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 78
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 89
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local language. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 73
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, with the invent of technology, ways of broadcasting inf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, apart from, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19801980198 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8629939792 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4033237671 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268605696344 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790717612049 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434361974948 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147903809152 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254012597096 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.