Social media has gained a great deal of popularity in past few years. There are numerous platforms available in the market through which one's life can be completely exposed to the whole world. The positives of social media transparency outweigh the negatives and this essay will showcase that there is not much harm in publishing content of personal lives of celebrities.
Undeniably, we all look down upon our favorite celebrities and cherish even their single glance on social media. These people in some way or the other motivate us to follow them and through various media platforms we get to know them more. For example, my neighbor wants to become a wrestler and he gets inspired whenever he watch his role model's videos. Not only it boost us to do good in life, but also provide entertainment. Apart from their reeled content, people find fun in their day to day life. For instance, during quarantine, what famous people are doing at their homes became the interest of their fans.
Nevertheless, with the above salient features, comes he popularity they earn through social media. There subsists many struggling actors who did not gain much appreciation in their carrier, however, by showcasing their daily activities in the media invited applaud for them, which exemplifies the above point. Additionally, giving up data of famous people aids the business of photographers, editors nd content writers. Many photographers are now employed to get clicks of celebrities outside gym, airports and their homes. Not only they get salary but also incentives for capturing high-ranked celebrities.
Although everyone in this world deserve their privacy but employment and inspirational factor far surpass the need of not having people's life transparent. At last, it should not be banned, however it can be minimized.
- Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money How might having a lot of money make people happy What other things in life can make people happy 73
- Some feel that students should not have to take standardized tests in school To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries most shops and products become identical Some people think it as a positive development while others believe it as a negative development Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- in many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s available in the market through which ones life can be completely exposed to the w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'watches'.
Suggestion: watches
...estler and he gets inspired whenever he watch his role models videos. Not only it boo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'boosts'?
Suggestion: boosts
...tch his role models videos. Not only it boost us to do good in life, but also provide...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, apart from, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78041824616 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656462585034 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1658632453 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117366082886 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382798258794 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354812187355 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081435208724 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341394246467 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.