Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries. Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment, others believe they are a serious threat to energy security.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the last few years use of renewable energy has gain importance. Experts throughout both the developing and developed world have debated whether green houses help in reducing costs and conserving environment or are considered a serious threat to energy security. This essay will argue both the views however, personally I strongly agree that use of renewable energy resource as it has several benefits.
On the one hand there are people who argue that renewable energy/ green houses are not dependable. The central reason behind this is that renewable energy depends on external factors like sun, wind and water and in case of bad weather conditions there could be a disturbance in the power supply. For example, solar panels can generate electricity only during the day time as they function because of sunlight hence during a cloudy day or during monsoons the electricity generation would be difficult. Hence relying on only renewable energy is not considered to be steady.
On the other hand renewable energy/green houses uses natural resources which are infinite and not use resources like oil and fossil fuels which are finite in quantity. Green houses are considered to environmental friendly this is largely because as it does not release CO2 gases which in turn aggravates global warming. Also, green houses helps in reducing cost of the energy thus making it affordable for people. For example, an extensive study by Oxford University showed that over countries like Iceland who survive on renewable energy / green houses are considered to be less polluted and do not suffer from adverse climate change. Thus it is possible to state beyond doubt that renewable energy helps in preserving the depleting resources like fossil fuels and also helps in conserving the environment.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that green energy has positive effects on environment. It is predicted that in near future the importance of renewable energy and saving finite resources will increasingly grow in importance.
- Some people believe that it is important to give gifts to friends and family to show that we care about them. Others think that there are better ways to show that we care. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active, as they were in the past. What are the main causes of this situation? Suggest some possible solutions. 78
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that the Olympics is no longer important in the 21st century. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ctricity generation would be difficult. Hence relying on only renewable energy is not...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not suffer from adverse climate change. Thus it is possible to state beyond doubt th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uture the importance of renewable energy and saving finite resources will increas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27300613497 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.702443559 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0008850399 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.785714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254414615514 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963522918481 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727374630038 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16388445514 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789243631936 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.