Nowadays, people move from one country to another for work. Some people think children of these families suffer because of this, while others think it is helpful for them. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
At present, due to globalization people tend to work at different parts of the world for various duration based on their job requirements. Because of this working mode many of their children's education is severely affected, on the flip side, people assume this would encourage pupils to learn adapting skill and engross their knowledge with different culture. In the following passage, I will discuss both the views and share my opinion.
Adaptability is an important skill to lead a successful life. When parent shuffle between work locations, their children will quickly learn to adapt according to the new atmosphere, this skill will help their future aspects significantly. Additionally, kids could find an avenue to engross their knowledge to learn new languages and different culture. Also, an opportunity to meet new friends of different nations which will help them in understanding different traditional values. For instance, my friend frequently travels to different countries due to various onshore assignments, and his kid at present could speak 3 foreign language fluently.
On the negative side, children will lose their continuity in education, when they transfer schools in short duration. Furthermore, at time new class mates will become strangers for them to adjust, which will discourage for kids to go to schools. For example, my neighbor's kid mother working as regional manager in bank, gets transfers for every 3 years, where her kid shows less interest to go to school due to new class mates. Moreover, learning different educational standards such as CBSE and ICSE, could possibly create confusion among kids. Thus, it has believed that migrating to different locations could be potential threat to their quality of education.
In conclusion, parents need to understand the capacity of their children in adjusting to new environment, which will gauge them to decide of working multiple locations. Similarly, many parents felt that children are losing their interest due to migrations, hence, considering interest towards education is paramount for every pupil. In my view, multiple work locations should be avoided for the benefit of children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | POOJAN JOSHI | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-13 | jakirph365 | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | dazzle | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-24 | niks54 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | Sisilifreeze | 84 | view |
- Cycling is more environment friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popular be increased? 78
- Cycling is more environment friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popular be increased? 78
- Some parents specifically mothers stay at home instead working and some people think That they should receive monetary compensation from the government Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give advantage for both and your point of view. 73
- Students in schools and university learn more lesson with their teachers when compared to other sources ( e.g., Television and internet). Do you agree or disagree? 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to adapt'.
Suggestion: to adapt
...me this would encourage pupils to learn adapting skill and engross their knowledge with ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...tional standards such as CBSE and ICSE, could possibly create confusion among kids. Thus, it h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44674556213 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86039597447 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.142615908 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171801687831 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623063586893 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476315317837 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122212221453 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477338512996 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.