Nowadays the population of the world is increasing rapidly. New homes and accommodation should be built for this additional population. Some believe that more houses should be constructed in existing towns and cities. Other believe that creating entirely new towns in the countryside to accommodate these houses are the best way. What is your opinion?
Looking into the recent figures declared by world census, increase in the population and hence, their dwelling requirements are asking thought to the issue. Many adepts are in favor of adding the accommodation in existing city area while others support the city expansion towards the countryside. My inclinations accord the later statement in the interest of nature and human being collectively.
If we see the existing situation in the most of the metro cities in different countries, they are already highly populated. Constructing additional buildings will not only dense the city area but also affect many other aspects of human life. Firstly, there can be a lack of resources like land, water, etc. which can increase the cost of living in the cities. For instance, Mumbai is the highly congested city of India where the cost of land and other sustenances have touched the sky. Secondly, more developments in left vacant places can reduce the open premises that can cause traffic congestion on roads and streets at a cost of aesthetic beauty of locations. At last, the environment of the cities is also getting polluted due to the increase in population and their activities.More the houses will turn the more pollution in cities.
On the other hand, expansion towards the countryside can enforce government to develop more facilities like transportation, water supplies, entertainment and so on. Hence, the living standards of villagers can also be improved through the developments. Moreover, the environment of the countryside is clean and quiet which is beneficial for the personal and social health. Finally, spreading towards the undeveloped area can have economic prosperity for the country. Business and residentials can hire more cheap resources like land, labor, etc. in a rural area which in return will create more jobs for villagers apart from traditional occupations for the personal and economic growth of villages.
To conclude, it is rightly said anything in excessive is dangerous. So rather overcrowding the cities, moving towards the countryside will be the best option for overall development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-05 | bhumikasuryavanshi | 81 | view |
- You have travelled by plane last week and your suitcase was lost. You have still heard nothing from the airline company. Write to the airline and explain what happened. Describe your suitcase and tell them what was in it. Find out what they are going to d 80
- You recently bought some food at a supermarket but when you got home you found that the food was in bad condition Write a letter to the manager of the supermarket in your letter explain what happened to you give details of the day and time of the purchase 87
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. Discuss both these vie 70
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among the poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? or is it the responsibility of the governments of the poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 71
- Being celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think to be a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: More
...ease in population and their activities.More the houses will turn the more pollution...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34821428571 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9523194478 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4835354802 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177450018593 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531305133825 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281338703337 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106188635972 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018412164461 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.