Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
It is believed that the new technology has benefited people's interaction in human society, at the mean time, these interation types became a controvisial topic. Some of them think they might be a negative development. The following essay will discuss with my perspectives.
To begin with, the daily life activities have been involved by the internet service more and more. People using social media app to meet new friends, finding a new job offer, even starting a new relationship with a stranger. Moreover, the automatical translation service has provided a barrier free of language between different people.
Communication has become straight forward wihtout any geographical limitation. There is no more boundry between different nations and countries. People can easily to access the different conturies and cultures through the mobile phone and computer at home. For instance, you can celerbrate your oversea friend's birthday by Facebook with a emoji gift. Moreover, dating with a foreign stranger became popular. You can set your critiria to select someone from the dating app, such as their hight, weight, appereace and hobits.
On the other hand, the fake news and fraud would damage the relationship easily. The tradional relationship is based on the actrual interaction during the offline activities. People meet for each other with face-to-face, their body language can be observed, their facial expression delivered the attitude. You will not find any of these behiviours online, all the digital interaction can be edited by the technology. The social survay can be controled, the speech can be modified, the truth has become digitalized, it is hardly comfirmed.
In conclusion, technology has provided a convinient life style to different people, everyone can communicate in a efficient way. Although there will be some hazard might be releated with the trust, I think it is still a possitive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-02 | chargedbyfaith | 56 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- the only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some people think to lower the maximum speed on all roads can make road saver ,some think there are another way. Discuss in both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people think that money is the best gift for teenagers, others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ersea friends birthday by Facebook with a emoji gift. Moreover, dating with a for...
^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ferent people, everyone can communicate in a efficient way. Although there will be some hazard mig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ent people, everyone can communicate in a efficient way. Although there will be s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42524916944 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93438808557 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611295681063 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3628058108 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9473684211 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176266883121 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472616214743 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353058758788 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093438660709 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324561808028 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.