Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
One of the hallmarks of the 21st century is the appalling conditions of the human habitat. In the past few decades, humanity has exploited and abused nature to an almost irreparable degree. The root cause of such atrocious circumstances is the surging amounts of dust produced across the globe. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the reasons behind the rising quantity of junk and possible solutions to solve this issue.
The skyrocketing volume of garbage produced is an outcome of several global adversities. The genesis of this predicament can be traced back to the crisis of overpopulation that is prevalent today. The increasing number of inhabitants across various countries, especially third-world nations, is a prime source of such enormous quantities of garbage. Moreover, due to the absence of sophisticated waste disposal and treatment facilities in these countries, discarding trash becomes complicated, having a detrimental impact on the environment. For example, many streets in Ha Noi is getting environmental pollution because of overthrowing waste.
Nevertheless, there are avenues available to ameliorate this plight suffered by humankind. Firstly, governments of nations where the production of scrap material is the highest have to make stringent alterations in administrative policies. Laws have to be implemented that curb the improper disposal of trash by the public. Imposing hefty penalties as monetary compensation or community work has to be introduced to reduce practices like littering. Additionally, the carbon footprint and non-biodegradable waste produced by major corporations have to be regulated. Also, environment-friendly measures have to be taken by such organizations regularly to indemnify the ruinous effect of their operations.
Finally, the damage that has already been done to nature by the actions of the human race is irreversible. Regardless, we must take a stand to keep the production of detritus in check so that future generations are relieved from even dire living conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that only employees who have worked at a company for a long time deserve to be promoted to a higher position What is your opinion about this 78
- Some people like to try new things for example places to visit and types of food Other people prefer to keep doing things they are familiar with Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this happening How could this be controlled 73
- A magazine wants to include contributions from ts readers for an article called The book that influenced me most Write a letter to the editor of the magazine about the book that influenced you most In your letter Describe what this book was about Explain
- Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money How might having a lot of money make people happy What other things in life can make people happy 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...overpopulation that is prevalent today. The increasing number of inhabitants across...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, third, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6525974026 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40046992824 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649350649351 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6002153548 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.411764706 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860930547225 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243244825875 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284882312483 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443560894017 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157265380742 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.